Civilizing the Economy A New Economics of Provision

Money and the Commons

Posted Mar 15, 2011 by Marvin Brown in Uncategorized, 2 Comments

It would make a world of difference if we stopped treating land and labor as commodities and began to recognize them as providers of wealth.  It might make an even greater difference if we discarded our childhood view of money as something to put in a piggy bank and took a more adult view of money as something we share in common.As I demonstrated in Civilizing the Economy, treating money as property ignores its role in social relations, as well as its vital function in a civic economy.  The notion of the Commons might help to advance this argument.

There are several notions of the commons, but for now let’s say that the commons are the sources of things that we turn into resources for providing for our families and communities. Most individuals acquire water, for example, through complex water delivery systems to towns and cities, which we can call a system of provision.  This system of provision channels a common source (water) through various allocation structures and technologies, which then becomes available to the individual city dweller.

The commons, because it is a commons, is not for sale.  It is not property that can be owned.  Land is the classic example here.  Land belongs to the living system of the planet.   To think you can own a forest, for example, is to see the forest as separated from the biosphere. Destroy the forest’s natural environment, and the forest dies.  This does not mean that we cannot manage forests for lumber.  It does mean that forests belong to the commons.  Now the trick is to both protect the commons and to facilitate the use of common sources to meet human needs—in this case to build houses.  This is part of a process that transforms natural provisions into provisions for our families and communities.

Now there is a significant difference between forests and money.  You can use forests to build houses, but you cannot use money to build anything.  It does not provide us with anything we have reason to value, such as education, health, or security.  This confuses some people because they forget that money is not a property—the piggy bank mentality.  In fact, money has a very particular function in any system of provision.

Most of us most of the time acquire resources by participating in systems of provision—such as the food system or the educational system—that draw on natural, scientific, technological, and cultural sources—sources that represent a wealth of the commons—a real commonwealth.  This common-wealth is continually used and recycled through distribution systems of gifts, exchanges, and entitlements.

Money has a rather unique role in this economic transformation of common sources into useable resources.  It is not a source like land, but neither is it a resource that we can eat, heat, or enjoy.  It is not a product or a service.  In contemporary systems of provision, however, it is, shall we say, “what makes the world go round.”

Money is the means for sharing the commons with all.  As credit for businesses, as a means of exchange, and as a promise to pay, money is one of the languages of commerce.   When it functions as it should, it is a common language, owned by no one, loaned to many, and used by all.

The function of banks in these systems of provision is not to turn loans into commodities (That was a major reason for the 2008 financial crisis) but to make credit available for providers of goods and services, and to keep the promises to pay implicit in saving and pension plans.  Governments, on the other hand, have a duty to protect the integrity of money as they have a duty to protect all that we share in common.

There is more to say about money and the commons, and more to learn.  Still, whatever we say will depend on our selected worldview.  If we think within the framework of a civic economics of provision, we will have to give up our piggy bank attitude toward money.  That’s a start.

2 Responses to “Money and the Commons”

  1. dggc gheggm says:

    February 19, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    Know about P2P Foundation? There's an article called, "Credit Commons" mostly qouting Thomas Greco. One alternative credit/debit concept is credit clearing circles. And there are several open source alternative credit systems. I can't link you from my phone.
  2. Marvin Brown says:

    February 19, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    Yes, Civilizing the Economy was selected as the book of the year in 2010 by P2P Foundation. Thanks for asking.

Leave a Reply

*

Marvin T. Brown, Ph.D teaches business and organizational ethics at the University of San Francisco and Saybrook University in San Francisco.

This book is the culmination of 30 years of teaching and writing on business and society from a communicative perspective. Visit workingethics.com for more information.

Adam Smith Atlantic trade banks biosphere citizen Citizens United city civic civic conversations civic economy civic membership civilizing the economy common citizen Commons corporate citizen corporation as property corporations democracy disagreement economics of dissociation economics of provision Egypt future health care reform invisible hand John Locke Kant libertarianism membership money moral equality ownership property property relations protection reciprocity Scotland slavery Smith and slavery Smithian economics sustainability taxes the civic tobacco trade Wall Street

Cambridge University Press
Local Bookstores
Amazon
Barnes & Noble